During the darkest time of the Second World War, when Britain was all alone faced with the formidable German Luftwaffe that had the mission to annihilate Britain, it was the heroism and bravery of the Royal Air Force fighter pilots that saved Britain.
To express the nation’s gratitude to these brave young men, Churchill, the wartime leader of Britain, concluded his speech in the House of Commons by stating “Never in the field of human conflict was so much owed by so many to so few.” The many were the people of Britain; the few the fighter pilots.
To fathom the depth of Justin Trudeau and his ideological clique’s betrayal of Canada, we have to reword Churchill’s famous statement: “Never in the history of the Canadian nation was so much harm done to so many by so few.”
Justin Trudeau’s 2017 Bill C-16 enshrined gender self-identity and gender expression into the Human Rights legislation, thus making it protected grounds from discrimination. The legislation established enhanced sentencing for anyone found guilty of “discrimination.”
In so doing, as writer Amy Hamm wrote in the National Post on December 20th, 2024, Justin Trudeau “betrayed every female within our borders by legislating the lie that males can simply declare themselves to be females,” thus eroding sex-based protections for women in spaces like women’s shelters and sports.
In consequence, under Justin Trudeau’s watch, increasing numbers of convicted male sex offenders with intact male genitals who claimed female identity were transferred to women’s prisons, leading to numerous cases of sexual assault against women prisoners.
We can only conclude that Justin Trudeau, despite his pretension of feminism, is guilty of the betrayal of the women of Canada. Women prisoners who are serving time for violation of the law and are paying the price for their unlawful actions through incarceration do not deserve to be sexually assaulted by convicted transgender sex offenders with fully-functioning male genitalia.
Justin Trudeau sought to destroy the very fabric of Canadian society, in order to satisfy his psychological need for recognition, by pushing through policies and legislations that were inimical to the survival of Canadian culture.
Another example of Justin Trudeau’s assault on Canadian culture has been the replacement of the image of Canada’s first prime minister and founder Sir John A. MacDonald on Canadian ten-dollar bank notes.
An effective way to destroy a nation is to destroy the nation’s historical and cultural institutions. To satisfy his insatiable psychological need to appear “progressive” Justin Trudeau did both to diminish Canada.
As the leader who ensured Canada’s survival and prevented the then unorganized lands which now constitute Canada from being absorbed by the American empire to our south, MacDonald played the leading role in the creation of the Canadian government.

Then came Justin Trudeau, who replaced him on Canadian ten-dollar banknotes with a Black woman whose only achievement was to sit in the wrong section of a theatre. He was also planning to replace the image of Sir Wilfrid Laurier, which is on five-dollar banknotes, with that of an Indigenous tribal chief, but he backed out, fearing strong Quebec reaction.
It is now time to remedy this assault on Canadian identity and restore Sir John A. MacDonald to his rightful place on Canadian ten-dollar banknotes.
The American equivalent of Trudeau’s destructive action would be to replace on American banknotes George Washington’s image with that of Rosa Parks who refused to sit in the back of the bus. The actions of both these women are commendable but do not rise to the level of nation-building.
Most of the above-mentioned destructive policies of Justin Trudeau can be remedied in due time. Those policies that can never be remedied include his policy of open borders, which has allowed millions whose cultures and traditions are in grave conflict with Canadian culture and way of life to enter Canada under Justin Trudeau’s slogan of “Diversity is our Strength.“
Here we quote an excerpt from the late British statesman Enoch Powell’s speech of 1968 warning Britain of the consequences of mass immigration:
“Those whom the gods wish to destroy, they first make mad. We must be mad, literally mad, as a nation to be permitting the annual inflow of some 50,000 dependants, who are for the most part the material of the future growth of the immigrant-descended population. It is like watching a nation busily engaged in heaping up its own funeral pyre.
So insane are we that we actually permit unmarried persons to immigrate for the purpose of founding a family with spouses and fiancés whom they have never seen.”
Another aspect of Justin Trudeau’s open border policy has been to allow more than one million international students to enter Canada, thus wreaking havoc on academic standards throughout the educational system.
As the Canadian Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) officials, Aiesha Zafar and Pemi Gill, testified on 23 September 2025 before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Citizenship and Immigration, at least 47,000 (but according to the Committee chair Michelle Rempel-Garner’s calculations based on data provided to her previously the numbers are 79,000) of those holding study visas have never attended the educational institutions they were expected to attend and IRCC has no record of their whereabouts, which means they have simply disappeared in Canada and are therefore in Canada illegally.
Some of these students’ study permits have been withdrawn due to criminality. The officials could not provide the numbers for the withdrawals due to criminality.
These study permit holders usually had presented fraudulent documents to obtain study permits. According to Aiesha Zafar’s testimony the country from which the student applicants had provided the highest number of fraudulent documents is India.
We assume those whose study permits have been withdrawn due to criminality and who IRCC has lost track of have found gainful employment in the extortion business in the Lower Mainland of British Columbia where the business has been flourishing in recent years.
And more alarming is the audit of the International Student Program issued by the Auditor General Karen Hogan on Monday, March 23, 2026, which stated that “about 150,000 cases in 2023 and 2024 were flagged because the student visa holders may not have been complying with the terms of their study permits. Such files are most often flagged because students are not attending the academic institutions that accepted them.”
In the latest IRCC data update, Canada hosted 1,040,985 study permit holders – across all educational levels – as of 31st December 2023, compared with 804,370 at the end of 2022.
Study permit holders by country:
India accounted for 447,085 of study permit holders at the end of 2023, representing 41 per cent of the total, following an increase of 34.1 per cent over the previous year.
China remained in second place with 102,150 permit holders, a 2.7 per cent increase, while the Philippines held third with 48,870 – a jump of 51.2 per cent over the previous year.
The top five was completed by Nigeria (47,965 study permit holders, +113.2 per cent) and France (26,980, -0.1). Among the top ten nationalities, South Korea was the only other to register a decrease, while there were increases for Iran, Nepal, Vietnam and Mexico.
All content on this website is copyrighted, and cannot be republished or reproduced without permission.
Share this article!




The truth does not fear investigation.
You can help support Dominion Review!
Dominion Review is entirely funded by readers. I am proud to publish hard-hitting columns and in-depth journalism with no paywall, no government grants, and no deference to political correctness and prevailing orthodoxies. If you appreciate this publication and want to help it grow and provide novel and dissenting perspectives to more Canadians, consider subscribing on Patreon for $5/month.
- Riley Donovan, editor